Mazdoor: Class-VIII, Preference shall be given on good physique & sportsmanship.. Helper: Class-VIII from any Govt. Mr. Ranjit Kumar submitted that on account of the ban imposed by this Court on 11 recruitment before the 153 employees were absorbed, no fresh appointments could be given in the category of compassionate appointment, which has created growing resentment amongst other categories of workmen, who were also waiting for appointment for similar posts.13. to attend the selection process strictly in accordance with the directions issued by this Court. While disposing of the appeal on 20.11.2006, this Court injuncted the respondents from making any recruitment from outside till such time as the 153 workmen were absorbed against regular vacancies in the concerned category. Click Here to Download . and the Mazdoor Sangh, we are not inclined to grant the prayer made on behalf of the O.N.G.C. Mr. Ramchandran submitted that on account of the ban imposed by this Court on recruitment before the 153 employees could be absorbed, no fresh appointments 9 could be given in the category of compassionate appointment, which has created growing resentment among other categories of workmen who were waiting for appointment in similar posts.11. The learned Single Judge accordingly modified the order of the Tribunal and directed the respondents to treat the employees who were covered by Standing Order 2(ii) as regular employees.5. 11. When the matter was brought to this Court by the O.N.G.C., this Court restored the order of the Tribunal whereby the 153 workmen identified to be eligible for regularization were to be treated at par with the regular employees and their services were to be treated as having been notionally regularized from 1.5.1999. Amount equivalent to two month’s wages for each completed year of service in ONGC or amount equivalent to wages of left over period upto 60 years of age, whichever is less. When the matter was brought to this Court by the O.N.G.C., this Court restored the order of the Tribunal whereby the 153 workmen identified to be eligible for regularization were to be treated at par with the regular employees and their services were to be treated as having been notionally regularized from 1.5.1999. Haldia Municipality Recruitment 2019 → SAE (Civil), Clerk, Work Sarkar, Mazdoor, Helper Vacancies – Haldia Municipality, Purba Medinipur has displayed 13 vacant seats for SAE (Civil), Clerk, Work Sarkar, Mazdoor, Helper posts. However, the picture, as portrayed by Mr. Ramchandran, is not as grave as has been made out by him since all the persons concerned, namely, the 14 candidates, who are yet to be absorbed in regular vacancies in terms of the Tribunal’s order, as upheld by this Court on 20th November, 2006, and those waiting for compassionate appointment, have been provided with employment, as contingent staff.
7. The dispute was ultimately referred by the Government of India to the Industrial Tribunal (Central) at Vadodara by way of Reference (ITC) No.6 of 1991 to decide whether the demand of the Respondent-Sangh for regularisation of such employees and for other consequential benefits, was justified and if the answer to the said question was yes, to what relief would the workmen be entitled.3. During the pendency of the Appeal, the Respondent-Sangh gave-up its claim with regard to the first direction given by the learned Single Judge and only pressed for implementation of the second direction.
However, the picture, as portrayed by Mr. Ramchandran, is not as grave as has been made out by him since all the persons concerned, namely, the candidates, who are yet to be absorbed in regular vacancies in terms of the Tribunal's order, as upheld by this Court on 20 th November, 2006, and those waiting for compassionate appointment, have been provided with employment, as contingent staff. for leave to appoint candidates from the compassionate category group before all the 16 workmen who were identified after the Award of the Tribunal to be eligible for appointment, are absorbed, as that would not only go against the order passed by us on 20th November, 2006, but would also amount to modifying the same. The O.N.G.C. Mr. Ranjit Kumar also submitted that as far as Mr. Ramachandran's contention that 60 workmen who were found to be ineligible for appointment were concerned, the same could not be accepted having regard to the fact that the Award of the Tribunal and the order passed by this Court clearly indicated that the Reference was to be restricted to the workmen whose names appeared in the schedule to the affidavit comprising 153 workmen. With the increase in the workforce over the years, the aforesaid practice came to be questioned by the Engineering Mazdoor Sangh, the respondent herein, on behalf of its members who had been employed as such casual/contingent or temporary workmen and an industrial dispute was raised in the form of a demand for regularization of such workmen. Ltd. V. Engineering Mazdoor Sangh has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0) licence, which permits unrestricted use and reproduction, provided the author or authors of the O.n.g.c. At this juncture, we may also refer to the submission which had been made on behalf of one of the intervenors from the compassionate appointment category that there were large number of vacancies available in which all could be accommodated. Similar provision was also made with regard to the workmen, who were to be employed on a seasonal basis. Learned counsel urged that 60 workmen were found to be unfit for regular 8 employment. Apply Online for Upcoming Mazdoor … Latest Employment News 2020 for Mazdoor Vacancy Recruitment Vacancy.
Apart from the orders passed by the Tribunal and this Court, equity demands that the workmen who have been in continuous employment as contingent workmen from 1992, should be considered first for regularisation before those, who come in at a later stage.19.