matt martin star wars canon

Ships are able to hyperspace ram other ships.As Martin states, you can choose the Star Wars canon you want to believe in, but that doesn’t mean the canon you choose to believe is actually the true one.It’s like saying Sauron won at the end of the Lord of the Rings because I choose to believe it. Everyone should read this. Back in April, he responded to a fan who asked about treating the “old GT version of Clone Was as canon.”He wrote, “I’m of the mind that you can consider anything you want canon if it makes you happy.”He added, “For the most part, it still works, but there are some contradictions with other storytelling if you really care.”I’m of the mind that you can consider anything you want canon if it makes you happy. The photo showed gold lettering (written in the Star Wars language) carved into the side of the bathroom stall. Matt Martin, Creative Executive for Lucasfilm's Story Group, has responded to fans' complaints about Star Wars canon by saying "It's all fake anyway.

Someone put the fancy words into a “Star Wars” language translator. Fan of fandom. "Matt Martin, the Creative Executive for Lucasfilm's Story Group, has responded to Needless to say, fans of the Expanded Universe weren't pleased by this decision, especially as some grew frustrated with Disney's sequel trilogy. Matt Martin is a Creative Executive in the Lucasfilm Story Group, and he's told fans who've been fretting about continuity and what's canon to calm down because Star Wars … But it leaves open the opportunity to retell it in the future.He would add, “Fans generally put too much emphasis on what the company deems “official”. The EU is no less good now than it was before due to the fact that it’s “no longer canon”. of expanded universe content by declaring it "not canon."

And I said if they like that story there’s no reason they can’t accept it as “real” in their version of Star Wars…”So in the example earlier, the person was asking about “recanonizing” a past story since that specific story hasn’t been explored in the new canon. I mean, I understand the complexity of having to deal with all of that history in order to make the last three movies, but I'm willing to bet that most Star Wars fans would have rather had the Thrawn trilogy than the movies we got.

Matt Martin from the Lucasfilm Story Group recently tweeted out the following: Great.

And I said if they like that story there’s no reason they can’t accept it as “real” in their version of Star Wars…He continued, “… but if there was an opportunity to tell that story now that new creator would not be beholden to that old version of the story.”… but if there was an opportunity to tell that story now that new creator would not be beholden to that old version of the story.Martin then summarized, “So to summarize: there is a reason that we need to internally know what is and isn’t canon so we can keep our line of official storytelling as aligned as possible but that doesn’t mean fans can’t individually pick and choose what they want to accept as true.”So to summarize: there is a reason that we need to internally know what is and isn’t canon so we can keep our line of official storytelling as aligned as possible but that doesn’t mean fans can’t individually pick and choose what they want to accept as true.Martin then noted that “it’s all fake anyway so you can choose to accept whatever you want as part of the story.”It’s all fake anyway so you can choose to accept whatever you want as part of the story.He concluded, “If you choose to only accept the real official canon: cool.

As George Lucas is considered the highest level of continuity (G-canon) in Star Wars fandom, any mention by Lucas of a name, character, place, or thing not previously known as canonical seems to eventually gain that status. It’s a much more articulate way of discussing something I’ve often tried to crunch down into 280 characters. However there absolutely is what I would call an "accepted canon" among fan groups.