eccv 2020 open review

Good benchmark numbers can be an indicator for a valuable contribution, but they are neither necessary nor sufficient for a valuable paper.Give enough reasons and information for your rating so that authors and ACs can understand it. Open-Edit: Open-Domain Image Manipulation with Open-Vocabulary Instructions Poster 1292 Towards Real-time MOT: A Joint Solution for Detection and Appearance Embedding Poster 1294 A Balanced and Uncertainty-aware Do not show the paper or supplementary material to anyone else, including colleagues or students, unless you have asked them to write a review, or to help with your review.Do not discuss the ideas or results in the paper with any non-reviewer.After the review process is complete, you must destroy all copies of the paper and erase notes or code you have written to evaluate the ideas in the paper, including results produced by any such code. Be aware that the Area Chair can see your name.Before you claim a paper is out of scope, carefully check the Call for Papers, clearly explain why, and try to suggest a better venue for it.Avoid referring to the authors by using the phrase “you” as it may sound confrontational; use instead “the authors” or “the paper.” Treat them like papers of which you do not know the authors.

This is optional.You have until Friday, May 29 23:59 UTC-0 to submit your rebuttal.Please maintain a professional and polite tone in your response even if you strongly disagree with a reviewer. You can enter a rebuttal to your reviews.

ECCV as a conference is looking for new ideas. Such dual submission is not allowed, independent of the number of pages, and will typically lead to immediate rejection both at ECCV and the other venue or journal. Minor flaws can be corrected and shouldn’t be a reason to reject a paper. However, refrain from asking brand new experiments. “Not new” must be backed by concrete references.Papers that are not accepted at a peer-reviewed venue do NOT count as prior work. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Only after a paper is withdrawn, it can be resubmitted to another venue.You will find three (or more) separate reviews. Likewise, mentioning a work under review in a presentation is alright.1. We remain committed to the ECCV series in 2020 and for this reason, we are committed to offer a fully online conference experience. However, do not give up just because the paper is not of your liking or because it does not perfectly match your area of expertise. Probably you can do better.First, please verify if the error message is maybe not that strange and can be explained by not filling a mandatory field or some other mistake on your side. Reviewers have been instructed to avoid asking for additional results that involve running new experiments.If you want to withdraw your paper, you can do so at any time using the Withdraw button. The reviewers will not count the words. In your review, you can ask the authors to provide specific information in the rebuttal, such clarifications on the proposed algorithm and on the experimental results. Authors are asked to take reasonable efforts to hide their identities, including not listing their names or affiliations and omitting acknowledgments during review. If you think that a crucial experiment is missing and that the paper cannot be accepted without it, you can reject the paper; however, do not ask the authors to perform this experiment in the rebuttal. Do not ask the authors to cite your papers unless this is clearly justified. This is a violation to the dual submission policy and will lead to immediate rejection at both ICPR and ECCV.Supplemental material can be uploaded only after the paper submission deadline will have passed.