Video Review. If a team challenges a play and its challenge is unsuccessful, they'll receive a two-minute minor penalty for delay of game. "We're not prepared to go there in terms of the game right now.
So the NHL took almost immediate action to ensure they won't happen again, or at least, will happen a lot less. But please tune in for the 2020 Stanley Cup playoffs to find out what unpredictable blown calls that cost someone a series will inspire next season's rules changes.The ESPN Daily delivers the biggest sports news and moments every weekday. "You think that's harsh? Oh, and the answer is Referees who call major or match penalties, other than ones for fighting, are now required to either confirm the call or reduce it through video review. )The new rule states that a player on the ice whose helmet comes off during play will be assessed a minor penalty if he doesn't exit the ice or retrieve said helmet within a reasonable period of time.
Here are the biggest differences you'll notice when the puck drops in less than two weeks.Referees in the NHL took a beating in the playoffs this year, and the league is taking steps to avoid it happing in the future. On this one, they can opt to erase the penalty if it's found the offending player did not, in fact, high stick his opponent.With more video review! It doesn't always happen that way. So maybe call it the "Meanwhile, a player who deliberately removes an opponent's helmet during play will be assessed a minor penalty for roughing, and for generally being rude.Please allow us to briefly dabble in the unparalleled thrills of faceoff location. Under the new rules, referees now have the option -- but not the obligation -- to review the play in order to confirm the call.This option will allow them to check for what Bettman called "friendly fire," like when a player is injured by a teammate's stick or their own stick, rather than that of an opponent. If they unsuccessfully challenge a second time, they'll earn a double-minor penalty for delay of game, and then it's double-minors for each unsuccessful challenge after that.Watching an opponent have a goal upheld and then defend four minutes of power-play time is a fairly steep price and, hence, a deterrent. In August 2010, the NHL held an "R & D camp" at the Toronto Maple Leafs’ practice facility, ... experimented with changes such as two-on-two overtime, shallower goal nets, a referee viewing the play from an elevated off-ice platform, and a rink with three face-off circles instead of the traditional five. They are still just potential new NFL overtime rules. Perhaps to cover scoring attempts by bad players, too. Rule 63.6 reads, "If the goal post is deliberately displaced by a goalkeeper during the course of a 'breakaway,' a goal will be awarded to the non-offending team." The new rule allowing for review doesn’t include fighting majors.
Wait to you see defensive players sucking wind thanks to the new line change rules. They don't get to call a timeout, either.Speaking of dislodging the net, do you remember David Leggio?Alas, the NHL has joined the parade of "Leggio Rule" legislation we've seen in other leagues. That's the bottom line. Comments on this story are moderated according to ourIt is a priority for CBC to create a website that is accessible to all Canadians including people with visual, hearing, motor and cognitive challenges.Closed Captioning and Described Video is available for many CBC shows offered onAs usual, the league passed some rule changes over the summer.
Table of comparison. I give them credit.
Potential rule changes.
It doesn't matter if the call is obvious: Every major or match penalty, every time, gets a review.The refs can consult with the NHL Situation Room to make sure they have access to all available video feeds, but can't consult about the play itself. They want to get it right. The video review either confirms the five-minute major, or reduces it to a two-minute minor penalty. This a great little well-deserved advantage for attacking teams.Yes. (We're not sure why "breakaway" is in air quotes. By the book, if a referee believes a player has struck an opponent's head with his stick and an injury occurs, that player is given a four-minute double-minor penalty for high sticking. Sometimes you get the benefit. And it seems like some of them might backfire. Officials will be able to look at a monitor and either confirm the call or reduce it to a minor penalty. That would be something that wouldn't be terribly productive and would be terribly disruptive," Bettman said.Rather than potentially losing a timeout in some situations, the NHL will now penalize teams that waste our time. As nice as it is to win a game, if you ask the players afterward, they want to win the right way, with the right calls. Every offseason, the NHL tweaks its rulebook. This challenge only covers those "black and white" calls that are starkly defined by the rulebook, rather than subjective penalty calls by the refs.